SiftQ vs
Linkup.

SiftQ crawls the public web; for users who don't need licensed publisher access, we cover broader ground at lower cost.

TL;DR

Different use cases. Linkup for legal-clean editorial. SiftQ for general agent retrieval on the public web.

SiftQ

Why pick us

You are building agents on the open web and don't need licensed publisher feeds.

  • Broader public web crawl
  • Lower per-query cost
  • Multi-modal coverage
Linkup

Why pick them

You are an enterprise that needs explicit content licensing for editorial-grade output.

  • Licensed publisher content
  • Legal-clean for enterprise
  • High-quality editorial sources
Side by side

At a glance.

Preview · numbers below are illustrative pending audited benchmarks

SiftQLinkup
Licensed publisher contentnoyes
Crawl breadth1.2T pagescurated
Cost / 1k queries$3$25+
Multi-modal scopes103
PricingFree 1,000/mo, $0.003/query.Premium tier, enterprise pricing.
Linkup's positioning

Linkup focuses on licensed premium publisher content — solid for legally-clean enterprise use cases.

SiftQ's positioning

SiftQ crawls the public web; for users who don't need licensed publisher access, we cover broader ground at lower cost.

Also evaluating

Other comparisons.

retrieval-api
SiftQ vs Exa
Neural search for AI agents.
retrieval-api
SiftQ vs Tavily
Search API built specifically for RAG / agent use cases.
retrieval-api
SiftQ vs Jina AI Search Foundation
Search + reranker + reader, open ecosystem.

Try it on your
actual workload.

The truest benchmark is your own queries. SiftQ's free tier gives you 1,000 / month, no credit card.